Thursday, October 16, 2008

Ray Lowry 1944-2008 UPDATED


British gag cartoonist, and illustrator for the punk rock band The Clash, Ray Lowry, passed away on October 14th.


Above: Mr. Lowry's most recent cartoon from the October 4th Spectator magazine.

From the BBC News announcement:

"He was found dead at his home in Lancashire on Tuesday.

"He contributed illustrations and cartoons to NME throughout the 1970s and 1980s as well as Punch, Private Eye and The Guardian, among others.

"Lowry accompanied The Clash on their 1979 tour of the US and later designed the artwork for London Calling."

Above cartoon from Mr. Lowry's site.

UPDATE: Tom Spurgeon has an obit & links here.

Hat tip to Dirk Deppey at Journalista!

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Video Your Vote

David Gillette, "Cartoon Journalist," asks that if you see something at the polling booths, then say something -- or, better yet, video it and put it out there. The video runs about a minute and a half



I've never heard of Gilette before, aside from this Drawn piece, but I did like his sentiment. While I don't hold PBS in high esteem (If they got all those "business reports" shows, why isn't there a "labor report" show?), I do believe in transparency. Maybe we should all make sure we got our video recording phones with us on November 4th.

Happy Birthday Paul Giambarba!

A very happy 80th birthday to cartoonist, illustrator, design director, author Paul Giambarba.

Whenever I am working, I know ...




I am working in the shadow of GIAMts -- er, giants --!

Happy Birthday, Paul!



Paul's page at the National Cartoonists Society

The Branding of Polaroid 1957-1977 by Paul Giambarba

Brian Fies: Happy Birthday, Giam!


Stacy Curtis: 80 Awesome Years Old

"How to Cartoon" Books Advice

Here are some random thoughts about how to cartoon from a series of "How to Cartoon" books that I randomly pulled off the shelf. The books range from 1967 to 2007.


"It is likely the height of arrogance, not to mention utter foolishness, for me to attempt to writing a book such as this.Considering that all of human effort could perhaps be Ozymandian folly,the search for meaning, catharsis and dignity in the humble act of cartooning may seem an especially delusional quest. Perhaps this will end up as simply another 'blip' in a long line of misguided, ineffectual primers written by mediocre cartoonists -- a limp, halted spike in an already insipid graph of unworthiness.who, after all, wants to take lessons from losers?"
from CARTOONING PHILOSOPHY AND PRACTICE by Ivan Brunetti, Buenaventura Press, Oakland, CA, © 2007 by Ivan Brunetti


"With the potential to utilize panels, characters, word balloons, captions and an unlimited special effects budget, the comic feature is a unique vehicle for humor and self-expression."
from YOUR CAREER IN THE COMICS by Lee Nordling, Andrews McMeel, © 1995 by Lee Nordling



"The cartoon made something of a comeback in the 1970s after a decade or two of atrophy. Editorial cartoonists get more vigorous in their attacks on public officials, one of the good things to come out of Watergate; gag cartoonists tackled subjects that, a few years earlier, editors would not have touched with a ten foot pencil; comic strips became funny again; and advertising and public relations types seemed more willing to poke a little fun at their products or clients."
from CARTOONING by Roy Paul Nelson, Henry Regenry Company, Chicago, © 1975 by Roy Paul Nelson


"Imagine an unlikely situation. You're sitting in a doctor's outer office, waiting for your appointment. The man or woman across the room -- a total stranger -- looks at you and says, 'Make me laugh. I'll give you seven seconds.'"
from THE CARTOONIST'S MUSE A GUIDE TO GENERATING AND DEVELOPING CREATIVE IDEAS by Mischa Richter and Harald Bakken, Contemporary Books, Chicago, © 1992 by Mischa Richter and Harald Bakken


"Among the attractions of cartooning as a profession are low overhead and the absence of technology. The cartoonist needs no complicated tools nor engineering degrees. Some paper, pens, a brush and ink will do it. You can be outfitted for your career in an hour, for forty dollars."
from CARTOONING THE ART AND THE BUSINESS by Mort Gerberg, William Morrow, New York, NY, © 1989 by Mort Gerberg


"Each experienced writer and cartoonist has his individual way of producing visual humor. One will do extensive reading, culling germs of gags, usually of the cliche variety, from novels and mystery stories. Another will walk the streets hoping to get ideas out of the thin air. Some read the daily papers regularly and conceive ideas from current happenings. Still others attend gatherings with their ears cocked, hoping to get that funny line. There is the seeker of satire who locks himself in a sound-proof room and stares at a blank wall, while another will throw himself on a couch and project himself into a gag trance."
from CARTOONIST'S AND GAG WRITER'S HANDBOOK by Jack Markow, Writer's Digest, Cincinnati, OH, © 1967 by Writer's Digest


"The basic element behind good style in cartooning is proper training. Another prerequisite is complete dedication to the art form, In the pages that follow you will be exhorted to be constantly drawing -- drawing from the model, sketching and copying the masters, and doodling, a form of subconscious art that helps tap the imagination. These activities will help you achieve your desired goal: mastery of sound cartooning fundamentals."
from CARTOONING FUNDAMENTALS by Al Ross, Stravon Educational Press, New York, NY, © 1977 by Al Ross



from ED EMBERLEY'S DRAWING BOOK OF FACES by Ed Emberley, Little, Brown and Company, Boston & Toronto, © 1975 by Ed Emberley

Tuesday, October 14, 2008

Mike is Doodling


Doodling is fun, and it can lead to usable ideas. Here are some doodles, some nonsensical, some sensical. These have not lead to usable ideas as yet.


Above: when you think about it, that waterskiing squirrel (as seen on TV every couple of months) never was in a position to choose the life he leads. Not a cartoon per se, but an observation.

My doodles are getting looser and looser. Any more looser and the lines will just fall off the page.


Above: another doodle with no punchline. Most of the doodles here are blown up much larger than originally drawn. The one above is about 2 1/2 by 3 inches.


Above: "I gave the lawn male pattern baldness!"


Above: Just a silly drawing. I draw in a 6x9 inch pad, making a grid of 8 boxes on each page, both sides. In each box, I draw something.

Above: word association: Art Gallery, Bart [Simpson] Gallery, Cart Gallery, Dart Gallery. Hmm. No gag here, but it is silly.
Above: the usual reaction! from left to right: "This is good stuff!" "I hate this!"

Christoph Neimann: NYC Cheat Sheets

Although illustrator Christoph Neimann and his family have left Brooklyn for Berlin, he leaves behind a series of diagrams to show how he made his life easier in NYC in the NY Times' New York Cheat Sheets feature.

"Our building in the Williamsburg section of Brooklyn had no buzzer, and I would have to run downstairs to let friends in, accept deliveries, etc. After some training — and thanks to my 6’4” height — I perfected a maneuver I like to refer to as 'the Northside Eagle:' Place your left foot in the middle of the vestibule, lower your upper body to precisely 90 degrees until you reach the front door, while sticking out your right foot to keep the vestibule door from closing shut."

Monday, October 13, 2008

Hee Haw Comics


A buncha people telling jokes in a cornfield? What else could it be bur HEE HAW! in comic book form from Brian Hughes' Again With the Comics blog.

Hat tip to Newsarama, as well as several others places I can't recall.

Can anyone credit the artist?

Hippo Press Orphan Works Blurb

The free weekly newspaper THE HIPPO (available in the Manchester and Nashua areas of New Hampshire) spotlights the Orphan Works Bill and its effect on ... well, me, of all people.

Staff writer Heidi Masek has the story:

Local Color
Copyright blues

By Heidi Masek

• Whose work? While toiling over a bailout, the U.S. Senate also passed the Shawn Bentley Orphan Works Act of 2008 (S 2913) Sept. 27. The House of Representatives had not passed a version Oct. 6. Michael Lynch of Milton, N.H., is the national representative for the National Cartoonists Society. He explained that the first few paragraphs of the legislation “sound friendly” but actually the bill makes it easier for corporations to use images as theirs if they can’t find the owners. Present copyright law is “basically fine,” but Orphan Works would set up a registry for artwork in addition, which is one of the most controversial aspects, Lynch said. It would require anyone from a painter to a graphic novel creator to most likely pay per image they register or risk work being classified as “orphaned.” “Instead of me producing cartoons, I would probably have to go into the drywall business, which is the standard joke around cartoonists,” Lynch said. Lynch’s illustrations have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, Barron’s and Playboy, among other publications (www.heykidscomics.com). The Illustrators Partnership of America (www.illustratorspartnership.org) is organizing a fight against the legislation and lists more than 75 creators’ groups that oppose the bill.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Video: Editorial Cartoonists Joel Pett & Jean Plantu

Adam Gopnick hosts this short, informative chat with American editorial cartoonist Joel Pett and French editorial cartoonist Jean Plantu. Stay with it, and you get to see each of them drawing cartoons live.



The video is from the French Institute's January 19, 2006 event "Drawing Inspiration: The Art of Editorial Cartoons."

Front Yard


Just a couple of photos of the yard in the fall. The local paper says Columbus Day leaf peepers visiting New Hampshire will spend $85 million!


That's the wheelbarrow leaning against a fence post in the bottom left. And, next to that, you can see the remains of our tomato plants. No frost yet, but it's coming.

The Kirk Tribute

William Shatner. The Shat. Captain Kirk.

Without him, the new TREK movie will not ... [insert dramatic pause] ... be ... [ditto] ... STAR TREK.



The above 4 minute video, meticulously edited by Joseph Scotti, runs a little long, but so did The Shat. Lots of images and dialogue that long time STAR TREK (The Old Show) fans know in their bones. The background music adds to it. Scotti did a bang up job here. I can only wonder about the number of hours he spent mixing this. My thanks to him.

Kirk is many things in the TV series: cowboy diplomat, self-assured playboy, elusive tactician, a self-sacrificing friend, a hero, maybe even a "tin plated dictator with delusions of godhood" -- but (say it with me) "he was NEVER a boy scout!"

Love or hate him, Shatner is Kirk. It's disappointing that the actor will not be seen as his iconic character in the new, reimagined, rebooted STAR TREK movie, scheduled for summer 2009 release. Nimoy will be in it, playing a featured role as Spock, as most of you know. (There will also be a younger actor playing the Spock role for the majority of the movie, and there is a large cast of mostly-unknown young actors portraying the original crew "in its first adventure.") But Nimoy is the only TOS cast member in the movie.

I'll miss the Shat energy, the Shat pause, the Shat judo/fistfights, and all those great speeches that can destroy a computer, too!

Oh, nice touch from Mr. Scotti: the final scene of the above video is the last shot of the final TV series episode, "Turnabout Intruder."

And here are a couple more of the best Shat/Kirk Moments:

"Risk is our business"


"All I ask is a tall ship"



More TREK Moments here

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Orphan Works: A Public Knowledge Postmortem

FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP

Orphan Works: A Public Knowledge Postmortem

10.9.08

"Orphan works relief was vigorously opposed by visual artists... And while we have thought some of their concerns misguided, they did a fine job of organizing and getting their voices heard."

That was the rueful conclusion Monday from the President of Public Knowledge. She was conducting a postmortem on her blog to explain why their last minute efforts to pass the Orphan Works Act failed last week.

Public Knowledge is one of the key special interest groups driving orphan works legislation. And while interested parties around the country were being told all week that the bill was dead, she now confirms that there was a secret last minute push to pass it:


"[W]ith the country's financial crisis raging [she writes] and Congress in the middle of deliberations over a bill to rescue our financial institutions, there was still an opportunity to get a bill done. But how? The best option was to get either House Courts, Internet and Intellectual Property Subcommittee Chairman Berman or House Judiciary Committee Chairman Conyers to take the Senate bill that passed and put it on the 'suspension calendar,' which is the place largely non-controversial legislation gets put so that it will get passed quickly. There can be no amendments to bills placed on the suspension calendar, but it needs a 2/3 majority to pass (italics added).


"On Saturday, September 27," she continues, she and others "were on the phone imploring the members to move the bill...":


"The negotiations went on for hours and hours on Thursday into Friday, but in the end, PK, working with the user community (libraries, documentary filmmakers, educational institutions and the College Art Association) could not agree with [sic] on language with the House staff. Late Friday afternoon, the House voted in favor of a bailout bill and everybody went home. Time had run out." http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1783


Public Knowledge has a "Six Point Program" to undo existing copyright law. "Orphan Works Reform" is Number 5. http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1245 And while they're "disappointed" they weren't able to pass the bill this session, she advises supporters to "focus on what positive things came out of the process, so [they] can move forward quickly next year."


PK says artists have learned their lesson


In her opinion, one of the "positive things" to "come out of the process" is that:


"[V]isual artists, graphic designers and textile manufacturers who opposed orphan works relief now understand that they must change their business models." (Italics added.)


Artists "must change their business models"? Is that a sound we hear from inside the Trojan Horse?

Whatever happened to the claim that this bill was only a minor tweak to copyright law - to let libraries and museums digitize their collections of old work - or let families duplicate photos of grandma?

That was the argument lawmakers heard last spring, when the bill was rolled out suddenly, scripted for quick and easy passage. But now that the anti-copyright lobby has had to fight for it, they've dropped their guard. Now it's time to openly lecture artists that the world is changing and we'd better get used to registering our work with privately owned "databases" -- at least if we want to ensure that our works won't become orphaned.

But of course that was the agenda all along.


PK says not all artists are misguided


PK's President wants Congress to know that not all artists are "misguided" - only those that oppose the bill. Currently, 80 professional groups do.

By contrast, she cites the Graphic Artists Guild as an example of artists who have learned their lesson. She praises GAG as "enlightened," because GAG supported the House version of the bill. She quotes a recent letter from GAG's President in which he admonished artists to "get real about this Orphan Works scare":

"I don't think Orphan Works is going to have a dramatic influence on how we do business [he wrote], but I hope it has awakened us all to the importance of tending to business issues. If we as a community invested a fraction of the energy we've expended on an apocalyptic vision of Orphan Works into protecting our own creations, protesting unfair contracting practices or writing letters to low-paying publishers, we'd be in a far better market position than we are today. The fact is that we give away more in the every day practice of our businesses than the government could ever take from us."

We replied to the GAG letter weeks ago, when it was first circulated to artists. We obviously disagree. Indeed, we'd point out that what the community of artists is doing by opposing this bill is "protecting our own creations":

  • The Orphan works bill would have a dramatic affect on business, because it would let people infringe our work without our knowledge, consent or payment.
  • Most people who succeed in our field do "treat art as a business."
  • People who are bad at business can't be used as proof that successful people must change their business models.
  • You can't justify exposing an artists' property to theft by telling him he didn't write enough "letters to low-paying publishers."
  • What artists do or don't "give away" on their own doesn't justify government's taking anything from them.
  • It's counter-intuitive to tell small business owners we should accept a bill that's bad for business to prove that we've "awakened to the importance of tending to business."
  • If we don't fight to keep the work we create, that would be the ultimate failure to tend to business.

A full response to the entire GAG letter is here: http://ipaorphanworks.blogspot.com/2008/09/orphan-works-why-bet-against-ourselves.html

The Orphan Works Act was based on a premise and a conclusion:

  • The premise is that the public is being harmed because it doesn't have enough contact information to locate copyright owners.
  • The conclusion is that artists must change their business models.
  • What's lacking is any evidence in between.

The Orphan Works Act was based on recommendations by the Copyright Office. But the Copyright Office studied the specific subject of orphaned work. They did not study the business models of artists who are alive, working and managing their copyrights. That means there can be no meaningful conclusions drawn from their study to dictate that such artists must change their business models.

From the beginning, artists have said we'd support a true orphan works bill. We've submitted precise amendments that would make one out of this bill. http://ipaorphanworks.blogspot.com/2008/07/hr-5889-amendments.html Our amendments have never been considered.

Instead, as PK's President noted in her postmortem, their last minute strategy for passing the bill would have "put it on the 'suspension calendar.'" And "[t]here can be no amendments to bills placed on the suspension calendar..."

The anti-copyright lobby is well funded. They have powerful backers. They've warned us they'll be back next year.

We should take them at their word.

- Brad Holland and Cynthia Turner, for the Board of the Illustrators' Partnership

______________________________________________________________

Over 80 organizations oppose this bill, representing over half a million creators.

U.S. Creators and the image-making public can email Congress through the Capwiz site: http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/ 2 minutes is all it takes to tell the U.S. Congress to uphold copyright protection for the world's artists.

INTERNATIONAL ARTISTS please fax these 4 U.S. State Agencies and appeal to your home representatives for intervention. http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/01_topics/article.php?searchterm=00267

CALL CONGRESS: 1-800-828-0498. Tell the U.S. Capitol Switchboard Operator "I would like to leave a message for Congressperson __________ that I oppose the Orphan Works Act." The switchboard operator will patch you through to the lawmaker's office and often take a message which also gets passed on to the lawmaker. Once you're put through tell your Representative the message again.

If you received our mail as a forwarded message, and wish to be added to our mailing list, email us at: illustratorspartnership@cnymail.com Place "Add Name" in the subject line, and provide your name and the email address you want used in the message area. Illustrators, photographers, fine artists, songwriters, musicians, and countless licensing firms all believe this bill will harm their small businesses.

Please post or forward this message to any interested party.
STOP THE U.S. ORPHAN WORKS ACT NOW.

National Debt Clock Runs Out of Digits

From the BBC: our debts are so big, the clock, first posted in Manhattan in 1989, will have to have another couple of digits added.

What a world, what a world!

Roy Delgado Booksigning


I'm posting this on behalf of my "partner in crime" Roy Delgado, one of the most prolific, widely published magazine gag cartoonists in the world today. So, if you're in the Tucson area, say hi and buy his great book A FUNNY THING HAPPENED ON THE WAY TO THE NEW YORKER.

Or, you can buy it in a bookstore or order it online. Check out the link above.


Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Bruce Higdon's Photos of the NCS Tour



Bruce Higdon has shared his photos via Flickr of the National Cartoonists Society's recent trip to visit wounded troups here and abroad.


Thanks, Bruce!

Cartoonists Find Humor in Global Financial Meltdown


Below: a video interview with Mssrs. Beattie and Taylor, the duo behind the British business-oriented comic strip Alex, which appears daily on the front page of the Daily Telegraph's business section.

Video: The Man Who Cartooned Muhammed

Here's Kurt Westergaard, a Danish cartoonist, in a 3 part subtitled interview. He drew a caricature of Muhammad with a turban as a bomb as one image of the dozen "Muhammad cartoons" in the Jyllands-Posten newspaper. His life was threatened, he went into hiding, and, recently, three suspects were arrested in a plot to kill the cartoonist this year.

Kurt Westergaard 1 of 3



Kurt Westergaard 2 of 3



Kurt Westergaard 3 of 3

Video: National Cartoonists Society in Germany


Above: screen capture from the video.

From the American Forces Network, here is a video report of the NCS's visit to the Landstuhl Regional Medical Center in Germany to draw cartoons for wounded soldiers.

A big hat tip to Bruce Higdon for this!

Orphan Works: The Big Internet Factor

FROM THE ILLUSTRATORS' PARTNERSHIP

Orphan Works: The Big Internet Factor

10.7.08


On October 2, several professional organizations sent a letter to every member of Congress, calling attention to the role of big internet companies in orphan works legislation. Here's an excerpt:

"We believe these bills mask an effort by Big Internet companies to profit by undermining existing global intellectual property rights protections...

"The lobbying efforts to promote this legislation pit small entrepreneurs and artists of all kinds against some of the largest and most well-financed Internet powerhouses in America...

"We find it deeply disturbing that the U.S. Copyright Office has so clearly and unambiguously advocated legislation that will privilege large commercial interests such as Google at the expense of creators and the countless small businesses that serve, and are dependent on the creative community.

"We find this even more troubling in light of Google's substantial contribution to the Library of Congress at a time when the Copyright Office was preparing its Orphan Works recommendations -- and at a time when Google had acknowledged to the SEC that its financial well-being is dependent on a business model that has already engendered multiple lawsuits for copyright infringement totaling billions of dollars.


"Google and other large database, advertising and search engine companies clearly have a major financial stake in the weakening of copyright law through new legislation. The Orphan Works Acts, if enacted in either of its current forms, would solve the problem that has vexed so many start-up internet companies: how to make money by giving away free content. By opening the door to potentially billions of "permitted" infringements of protected copyrights, this legislation would allow Big Internet to create an entirely new business model, by licensing content they don't have to pay for - through the digitizing, archiving and monetizing of the intellectual property of ordinary citizens."

To read the full letter go to: http://ipaorphanworks.blogspot.com/2008/10/orphan-works-big-internet-factor.html

The letter is signed by representatives of:

The Illustrators' Partnership of America
The Advertising Photographers of America
The Artists Foundation
The National Writers Union
pro-imaging.org
The Association of American Editorial Cartoonists
The National Cartoonists Society

______________________________________________________________

Over 79 organizations oppose this bill, representing over half a million creators.

U.S. Creators and the image-making public can email Congress through the Capwiz site: http://capwiz.com/illustratorspartnership/home/ 2 minutes is all it takes to tell the U.S. Congress to uphold copyright protection for the world's artists.

INTERNATIONAL ARTISTS please fax these 4 U.S. State Agencies and appeal to your home representatives for intervention. http://www.illustratorspartnership.org/01_topics/article.php?searchterm=00267

CALL CONGRESS: 1-800-828-0498. Tell the U.S. Capitol Switchboard Operator "I would like to leave a message for Congressperson __________ that I oppose the Orphan Works Act." The switchboard operator will patch you through to the lawmaker's office and often take a message which also gets passed on to the lawmaker. Once you're put through tell your Representative the message again.

If you received our mail as a forwarded message, and wish to be added to our mailing list, email us at: illustratorspartnership@cnymail.com Place "Add Name" in the subject line, and provide your name and the email address you want used in the message area. Illustrators, photographers, fine artists, songwriters, musicians, and countless licensing firms all believe this bill will harm their small businesses.


Please post or forward this message to any interested party.
STOP THE U.S. ORPHAN WORKS ACT NOW.

TV Digital Conversion PSA




A big hat tip to Johnny C. over at A Hole in the Head!